So, a bunch of whiny stereotypes are bitching about Abercrombie and Fitch finally doing something cool [if a bit overpriced], and how they’re not a stereotype, or something. Here’s a news article about it.

These ‘we’re not a stereotype’ stereotypes are screaming about a girlcott against the company for shirts that say things like ‘who needs brains when you have these’ [where these are ‘breasts’], and ‘do I make you look fat’ — neither of which are original [ever been to Hot Topic? Why not get angry at them? Because you’re too much of a goddamn stereotype to shop at that other filthy stereotype’s filthy low class store?] — but they’re kinda funny anyway.

What got me more than anything – what OVERFUCKINGWHELMED the STUPIDITY of the tv newscast about this pink and greenhaired treehugger looking gyrlygurl was the word GIRLCOTT.

Girlcott, because boycott has the word BOY in it and reinforces the phallocentric somethingwhatthefuckever…I don’t know. I’m not a womynist.

I looked up girlcott, though. Funnily enough, I found this

If a boycott is “a refusal to buy, sell, or otherwise trade with an individual or business who is generally believed by the participants in the boycott to be doing something morally wrong” or “a form of protest” then we propose the opposite — a girlcott :-) . A vote of ‘congratulations’, followed by an offer to buy, if the business can make the goods even better.

Buy up, girlcotters. Or shut the fuck up and realise you don’t have the right to be not offended.