Re: Noah's Mistake?

Posted by Gremlin on 14 February 1999 at 09:25:28:

In Reply to: Noah's Mistake? posted by Utahraptor on 14 February 1999 at 09:14:07:

: Here's a total theory on my aprt, whcih emans you may disagree with it, so any offense taken is your own fault, as you'r enot suppsoed to believe in this:

Okay.

: After the fllod, Noah reformed civilization exactly as Adma and Eve did (outside of Eden).

Did he? I doubt it. There would be differences.

So, naturally, by doing everything the same, we get the same results as last time.

I'll disagree with that. Nonlinear dynamics have proven the opposite. We seem to have different definitions of 'proof'.

ehcne the end of humanity's reign on Earth in the new Millennium.

Hence? As in 'from that, so will be'? I haven't seen any proof of homosapien extinction in the third millenium yet; it's still nearly two years away.

Think about it. If Noah did do everyhtign the same again, then it's his fault humans will go extinct very soon.

Two words: non sequiter.

Firts we are born with original sin form Adam and eve. Then we get a second helping from Noah. We are victims of our ancetsor's mistakes,a dn are suffering much like we are from their anti-environmentlaist ways.

Are we? I ahven't seen any reason to believe in that, either.

: Once again, this si all my theory (except for the anti-environmentlaist part, whcih has alreayd been proven true, even if noobdy knew the consequences at the tiem.)

What anti-enviromentalist theory has been proven true? That, regardless what we do to the planet, we can't actually hurt it? I'm not sure that's been proven yet, though I tend to agree with it.

So anybody wth half the rbian of a dead ameoba will know that offense is purely subjective, and therefore your own bloody stoopid fault for taking it in the first place.

I'll agree with that. The part about offence, I mean. I wasn't aware that dead amoebae had brains in any fractional amount =)

--Gremlin

Follow Ups:



199.45.253.101 - 199.45.253.101