Re: What's New

Posted by Utahraptor on 28 June 1999 at 09:05:31:

In Reply to: What's New posted by Gremlin on 26 June 1999 at 21:32:55:

: The problem has nothing to do with who started it; it's what's become of it. What's become of it is that there are suddenly all these new posts from Utahraptor with no point at all. Replies to dead threads, new posts without much thought, replies to his own posts...it's beginning to look like the NetForum did when Alan1 was posting fifty things a day about what a geek he was...or whatever he was trying to tell us. So that's not good.

The point is simple. If Imp likes replying to my posts degrading me, I'm gonna do the same to him. And with his post entitled I think, well, he really did set himself up.


: But about the copius amount of posts, there were a couple of questions left open.

:

  1. About disproving the existence of visiting extraterrestrials, fine: according to Men in Black the aliens never showed up until nineteen sixty-one, though according to Independence Day, they've been here since at least nineteen forty-seven. That's an apocraphy. So it becomes a religion. Two fictional sources are claiming two different things. So, as with the existence of deities, the burden of proof falls on the plaintiff. Or, behind Door Number Two, prove that I haven't got a Vector being driven by an alligator.
  2. About Imp being a nazi...he's not. And when in hell are people going to search out a better example? Every damned time someone looks at someone the wrong way, they're either a nazi or a slaveowner. Because the upper class of Niger sold the lower class to the highest bidder back in the seventeen hundreds. And because Hitler invaded Poland, France, and half of Europe, and, incidentally, picked up a few jews. If people wanna complain about that, they could probably complain a lot more about current circumstances in Rwanda, where more people are slaughtered in a month than there were during the entire second world war. It's called information; get yours today.

The aliens one is simple (barring anything from Ancient Egypt, when Stonehenge was built, other ancient cultures, etc. 1900's only.) There are two races (proven as defined as multiple confirmations of appearances.) The problem is, umans have thiss orta identification problem. Like how all Mexicans look like on famous guy, Or Italians look like an Italian celebrity. ro simply, how animals fot he same species all look alike to humans. All Collies look the same, all spidermonkeys look identical. Humans see aliens the same way. NAy smaller than human sized alien, wiht grey in their skin, big, black, almond shaped eyes, with no air, is the same speices. However, that is wrong. the oens from Roswell dubbed Roswellian by me, are nothing like the Pleiadians, or grays (Pleiadians dubbed by unknown. Grays by humans). Sure they have some similarities. But very few. Boht are smaller than humans, and have identical eyes. Everything else is diff. IF you actually bother to compare, you cna easily tell
they are not the same species. And Pleiadians ahven't been around since the 1980's really. At least noticeably. Also, Men In Black also says the mIB are the good eyes. And as anybody who's eveyr met them, or heard about them, they are not very nice guys. And there's mroe evidence to support theya re from the gov, than alien, as some believe.

: Oh yeah: about alternatives, Utahraptor has his own message board, and an EMail address. Both can be found at fly.to.starsystem if you're really looking for them. Just in case anyone really thought that there was nowhere else on the whole 'net to go with this.

And you can read up on the differences of aliens there. As well as posisble ideas for the black eyes (hint, not their real eyes.)

Follow Ups:



206.57.105.239 - 206.57.105.239